Choosing pH with temperature fixed at 30ยฐC, then choosing agitation speed with that pH fixed, is familiar. Even if each graph is smooth, the final combination is not guaranteed to be good across the full range. The effect of one factor may change at another factor's level.
This unit asks one question.
Why can changing one thing at a time not reveal factor combinations and interactions?
Align experimental language with four terms
- factor: an input variable the experimenter changes or controls
- level: the actual condition assigned to a factor
- response: the output measured in a run
- run: one application of a treatment combination to an independent experimental unit
Combining 30/37ยฐC with pH 6.8/7.4 gives two factors, two levels each, and four treatment combinations. Reading several plate wells at each combination does not by itself create more independent runs. The design defines the experimental unit: independently treated culture, batch, donor, or another unit.
OFAT sees only axes extending from the reference point
OFAT changes A alone at a reference condition, then B alone again at that reference. With two factors at two levels, it sees the reference, A-high, and B-high corners, but not A-high/B-high.
If response is additive, Y=ฮฒโ+ฮฒAA+ฮฒBB, the missing corner can be predicted from the two axis effects. But when ฮฒABรAรB exists, the A effect changes with B's level. This is interaction.
- no interaction: lines joining A low and high are parallel at B levels
- interaction: slopes differ or cross
Interaction does not mean โboth factors are individually significant.โ It means one factor's effect depends on the other's condition.
Even excellent line fits on each axis cannot tell whether the same slope holds at another factor level. The unmeasured high-high corner and interaction cannot be recovered from three OFAT regressions.
DOE is an information-allocation strategy, not a synonym for minimum runs
DOE starts by specifying the research objective and candidate model, then lays out treatment combinations and run order so effects can be separated. It is not a technique for reducing runs at any cost. Full factorial designs observe every combination; fractional factorial designs select some combinations while accepting assumptions that some effects are small and some terms are aliased.
A sound DOE plans all of the following:
- the question and measurement definition of the response
- controllable factors and realistic ranges
- candidate main effects, interactions, and curvature
- independent experimental units and replication
- randomization and blocking constraints
- analysis, diagnostics, and confirmation experiments
Distinguish statistical exploration space from regulatory design space
An area within factor ranges where a fitted model predicts the response criteria will be met may be called a โdesign spaceโ in an educational setting. Regulatory design space in ICH Q8, or MODR in ICH Q14, however, are domain concepts with development evidence, multivariate understanding, and submission/approval context. Do not automatically call the inside of a simple contour a regulatory-approved design space.
This course calls it precisely a statistical exploration region within the experimented factor ranges. QbD terms such as CQA and CPP are not prerequisites for DOE mathematics and should not support process claims without domain validation.
In-Silico Lab: see one hidden process in two ways
The Lab's hidden response is Y=70+8A+5B+ฮณAB.
- At ฮณ=0, compare whether OFAT and factorial effects agree.
- At ฮณ=6 or 10, inspect the high-high response that OFAT does not see.
- Consider under ยฑ1 coding why the AB effect is twice ฮณ.
- Answer whether ฮณ can be calculated from only the three OFAT points.
๊ฐ์ ์จ์ ๊ณต์ ์ OFAT์ factorial๋ก ํ์ํ์ธ์
A์ B์ ๊ตํธ์์ฉ์ ๋ฐ๊พธ์ด OFAT ๊ฒฝ๋ก๊ฐ ๋ณด์ง ์๋ high-high ์กฐํฉ๊ณผ ์กฐ๊ฑด ์์กด ํจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ์ธํฉ๋๋ค.
์ฒ์์ด๋ผ๋ฉด: ๋ฌด์์ ๋๋ฌ์ผ ํ๋์?
- 1. ์ง๋ฌธ์ ๋จผ์ ์ฝ๊ธฐLab ์ ๋ชฉ์์ ์ด๋ฒ์ ๋น๊ตํ ํ ๊ฐ์ง๋ฅผ ํ์ธํฉ๋๋ค.
- 2. ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ๋๋ง ๋ฐ๊พธ๊ธฐ์ฒ์์๋ n, ํจ๊ณผ, ์ฐํฌ ๊ฐ์ ์ ๋ ฅ ์ค ํ๋๋ง ๋ฐ๊พธ์ญ์์ค.
- 3. ์ ํฉ์ฑ ํ๋ณธ ๋๋ฅด๊ธฐ์ ํฉ์ฑ ๋ฐ์ดํฐ๊ฐ ๋ง๋ค์ด์ง๋๋ค. ๊ฐ์ ์กฐ๊ฑด๋ ํ๋ณธ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ๋ฌ๋ผ์ง ์ ์์ต๋๋ค.
- 4. ๊ทธ๋ฆผ๊ณผ ๊ณ์ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋น๊ตํ๊ธฐ๋ฐ๊พธ๊ธฐ ์ ํ ๋ฌด์์ด ์์ง์ด๊ณ ๋ฌด์์ด ๊ทธ๋๋ก์ธ์ง ํ ๋ฌธ์ฅ์ผ๋ก ์ ์ด๋ณด์ญ์์ค.
๋งํ๋ฉด ์ด๊ธฐํ๋ก ๋์๊ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณธ ๋ค ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ๋๋ง ๋ฐ๊พธ์ญ์์ค. ์ด Lab์ ์ ๋ต ํ์ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ ์๋๋ผ ํจํด ๊ด์ฐฐ ๋๊ตฌ์ ๋๋ค.
๊ฐ์ ์ค์ ์ ํฉ์ฑ ๊ด์ธก
๊ณ์ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
OFAT์ ๊ฐ ์ถ ํ๊ท๊ฐ ์ข์ ๋ณด์ฌ๋ ์กฐํฉ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ๊ตํธ์์ฉ๊ณผ ๋ค๋ฅธ ๊ผญ์ง์ ์ ์ ์ ์์ต๋๋ค.
๊ต์ก์ฉ synthetic model ยท bjs-factorial-sequence-v1. ์ค์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ํ๋จ์๋ ์คํ๋จ์, ๊ฒฐ์ธก, ๋ถํฌ, ๋ค์ค์ฑ, ์ฌ์ ๊ณํ๊ณผ ๋๋ฉ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ค์ ๋ณ๋๋ก ๋ฐ์ํด์ผ ํฉ๋๋ค.
JMP figures reveal DOE's purpose in advance
์ ์ด ํํํ์ง ์์ผ๋ฉด ํ ์์ธ์ ํจ๊ณผ๊ฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ ์์กดํฉ๋๋ค.
ํ ์ถ์ฉ์ด ์๋๋ผ ์กฐํฉ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ๋ฐ์์ ํํํฉ๋๋ค.
DOE๊ฐ ๋ง๋ ๋ชจํ์ ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ์์ผ๋ก ์ฐ๊ฒฐํ๋ ์ญํ ๋ง ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ๋ด ๋๋ค.
An Interaction Plot shows nonparallelism; contours and surfaces show combination space; a Prediction Profiler shows fitted-model predictions by condition. This unit is not a menu or optimization-clicking guide. A figure becomes meaningful only after understanding which points were measured and why.
DOE does not automatically turn observational data into an experiment
Having several factor columns in already-produced historical data does not make it DOE. Causal effect interpretation needs the experimenter to assign combinations and control run order, experimental units, and noise sources. Even within DOE, record and diagnose run failure, noncompliance, and measurement drift.
Takeaways
- Define factor, level, response, and run together with the experimental unit.
- OFAT observes only axes from a reference point.
- Interaction means one factor's effect depends on another factor's level.
- DOE arranges combinations to separate information for a candidate model.
- Question, replication, and randomization come before minimizing runs.
- Do not equate a statistical exploration region with regulatory design space.
The next unit reads 2ยฒ and 2ยณ full-factorial tables directly and calculates balance, orthogonality, main effects, and interactions.
Official supplementary resources
The process and Lab in this article are educational synthetic models.